Religion: Who needs it? :: social issues

Religion Who needs it?Why is it that humans atomic number 18 constantly looking elsewhere for what they are able to provide themselves? People with washers and dryers send their change state to be cleaned. Owners of houses stocked full of food can be found at McDonalds. Billions of people can be found each week intimate churches. Wait...the cleaners,McDonalds and churches? Yep. People are constantly trying to make their lives easier. Darwin theorized that this was part of Survival of the Fittest. That the easier we make our lives, the more like we are to survive. Religion is one more elbow room, along with self-starting coffee pots, that we have developed to make our lives easier and ultimately more bearable. Assuming that there is some master plan that we cant see makes. Religion is simply a self-made, self-serving whim. Humans are the only animals on the planet capable of keeping track of time. Because of this, we pompously assume that only the most valuable of projects are w orth our time. We sometimes say, That was a total waste of my time. What if our entire lives were a waste? What if there was nothing after this life to greet us? The idea that lives are giant wastes would obviously make same people rather annoyed. With religion in our life we are content in the belief that we are constantly working toward something. There is a reason for all the pain, heartache and suffering. Another counseling that religion is self-serving is through the way that it shuns responsibility. By way of religion we are able to place our eternal happiness on someone elses shoulders. Although it is our responsibility to live the kind of life that we think theology would want us to live, it is ultimately his decision wether we succeed or fail. Because of this I really appreciate the Buddhist way of thinking. Buddhist teach that you are to look internal yourself to find the inspiration and good to reach the ultimate goal, known as enlightenment. Through this it is no one s responsibility but your own if you arent happy or successful. It isnt that God has or hasnt blessed you, its that the answer lies within yourself and you just havent found it yet. The last way that religion is self serving and foolish is in another way that we make oursleves happier and more content. Through self-induced propaganda we believe that regardless of our situation in life, someone is watching us, and taking care of us.

Eucharist History :: essays research papers fc

Eucharist History -reenacts the closing eventsof jesus life -links past-present-future one ceremony-powerful, meaningful ritual -last of the 3 sacraments ofinitiation -prescribed by christ -have to see the communion asbody, not bread Eucharist celebrates -"a way ofremembering" -daily reminder of Gods love -jesus overlapbread at last supper/do this in memory of me -a thanksgivingfeast -"eucharist" means giving thanx Ritual Meal -earliestform of rituals are eating and gathering -sacrifice meal -ritualnot a routine -builds on the symbolism of a ritual mean Signand Symbols -symbol of gods love for us -jesus body -lastsupper/banquet -welcome others to participate in theeucharist -unfilled rejoicing -if we went to mass onsunday, it would make the rest of the week more meaningful-unified body -it is the most commonly received sacrament,most pivotal of 7 -as a community, we celebrate thepresence of christ in the eucharist -bread basic food formost people/closely assoc wit h nature human workVestements -white/purple/ bootleg robe Words -"Do this inMemory of Me." -"This is my body, which has been givenup for you." ST. ROBERTS CATHOLIC HIGHSCHOOL "THE ceremony" BY MARK HARNUMPresented to Mr. DiMaio NRE 2A0-09 MondayNovember 29 , 1993 THE EUCHARIST Thesis TheEucharist is a sign of Jesus death, and how He gave himselfup for us, and how we experience Him through His body.History of the Eucharist The Eucharist is a Jewish Ritual ofworship. It dates back down to the Last Supper, where Jesuscelebrated a typical Jewish community meal with His friends.Sharing a meal with family, (very important to the Jews) alsodates back to the Passover Meal. This is called the sacrament of the Eucharistof the Eucharist, and the early Christians added Jewishsynagogue service and then became the Liturgy of the Word.The Eucharist is a sacrament, and is also a ritual. It is arepeated sacrament, and is the most frequently employ amongall sacraments. It i s "a way of remembering" and a dailyreminder if Gods love. Jesus at the Last Supper sharedbread with us, and said "Do this in Memory of Me." This iswhy we have bread, because it represents Jesus body, andhow He gave Himself up for us. The first little while of theChurch, the "Mass was celebrated as a friendship mealcalled agape." Christians shared brought food to the housewhere they were assembled, but as the numbers increased,the meal was cut down to bread and wine. Today, theoffertory collection echoes the early years of the spirit givingat the Eucharist. It is living bread that came down fromheaven.

Eucharist History :: essays research papers fc

Eucharist History -reenacts the closing eventsof jesus life -links past-present-future one ceremony-powerful, meaningful ritual -last of the 3 sacraments ofinitiation -prescribed by christ -have to see the eucharist asbody, not bread Eucharist celebrates -"a way ofremembering" -daily reminder of Gods love -jesus sharedbread at last supper/do this in memory of me -a thanksgivingfeast -"eucharist" means giving thanx Ritual Meal -earliestform of rituals are eating and group -sacrifice meal -ritualnot a routine -builds on the symbolism of a ritual mean Signand Symbols -symbol of gods love for us -jesus body -lastsupper/banquet -welcome others to figure in theeucharist -unfilled celebration -if we went to mass onsunday, it would make the rest of the week more meaningful-unified body -it is the roughly commonly received sacrament,most pivotal of 7 -as a community, we celebrate thepresence of christ in the eucharist -bread basic food formost people/closely assoc with na ture military man workVestements -white/purple/black robe Words -"Do this inMemory of Me." -"This is my body, which has been givenup for you." ST. ROBERTS CATHOLIC HIGHSCHOOL "THE EUCHARIST" BY MARK HARNUMPresented to Mr. DiMaio NRE 2A0-09 MondayNovember 29 , 1993 THE EUCHARIST Thesis TheEucharist is a sign of Jesus death, and how He gave himselfup for us, and how we experience Him through His body.History of the Eucharist The Eucharist is a Jewish Ritual ofworship. It dates back to the Last Supper, where Jesuscelebrated a typical Jewish community meal with His friends.Sharing a meal with family, (very cardinal to the Jews) alsodates back to the Passover Meal. This is called the Liturgyof the Eucharist, and the early Christians added Jewishsynagogue service and then became the Liturgy of the Word.The Eucharist is a sacrament, and is also a ritual. It is a restate sacrament, and is the most frequently used amongall sacraments. It is "a way of remembering " and a dailyreminder if Gods love. Jesus at the Last Supper sharedbread with us, and said "Do this in Memory of Me." This iswhy we have bread, because it represents Jesus body, andhow He gave Himself up for us. The first little while of theChurch, the "Mass was celebrated as a friendship mealcalled agape." Christians shared brought food to the housewhere they were assembled, but as the numbers increased,the meal was cut down to bread and wine. Today, theoffertory collection echoes the early days of the spirit givingat the Eucharist. It is living bread that came down fromheaven.

Only Drunks and Children Tell the Truth

What is the Sixties Scoop? The term Sixties Scoop was coined by Patrick Johnston in his 1983 report Native Children and the Child Welfare System. It refers to the Canadian practice, bloodline in the 1960s and continuing until the late 1980s, of apprehending unusually high numbers of children of Aboriginal peoples in Canada against the Native parents will and fostering or adopting them out, usually into medium-classwhite families. An estimated 20,000 aboriginal children were taken from their families, (1).The Sixties Scoop refers to a particular phase of a larger history, and not to an explicit government policy. Although the practice of removing Aboriginal children from their families and into state care existed forwards the 1960s (with the residential school system, for example), the drastic overrepresentation of Aboriginal children in the child welfare system accelerated in the 1960s, when Aboriginal children were seized and taken from their homes and placed, in some cases, int o middle-class Euro-Canadian families.This overrepresentation continues today (2). In his play, Only Drunks and Children Tell the Truth, Drew Hayden Taylor manifests how Janices life is greatly impacted by the scoop-up leading to the loss of culture, identity crisis, and miss of sense of belonging. When an individual faces the reality of being take, life deal become dreadful and disconcerting. Firstly, as part of Janices loss of culture, she will encounter herself struggle to connect with her roots by not being able to understand or speak Ojibway (native language).For instance, when Janice says What was that she Amelia said to me in that language? , (Taylor, 80). This part expresses Janices want to receive and learn more about her culture. However, learning about it after thirty-six years of absence, will not provide her with the proper tell apartledge and deeper discretion of Native culture as a whole, on the contrary, it will give Janice only a vague grasp of it. Also, whe n Janice says I wonder if thats why I bought that white fur coat of mine, my heritage coming through, (Taylor, 91).In this case, it is clearly appreciated how Janice, who was removed from her family roots during the scoop-up, has grown up with an erroneous picture and mendacious beliefs of what Native people look like As a result, she has created a mistaken perception of herself as an Aboriginal descendant which will repercuss the race between the Native environment and herself. In addition to the loss of culture, adoptees will go through an identity crisis, which nates potentially make them feel fineable and confused preventing them from moving forward with their lives towards accomplishing their goals.As an illustration, Janice says, Im sorry I left the way I did. It must have been a horrible Christmas for you. save you must understand I didnt walk out on you. I walked out on me. To everybody I was Grace, but to me Im Janice. I dont know if I can ever be the Grace you wanted , or the Grace Barb wants. I dont know anything anymore , (Taylor, 101), she expresses sadness, uncertainty and incapability of discerning right from wrong. Thus, it can be deduced, she is suffering from identity crisis and she is unable to determine whether to hold on to her past or let it go and move on with her life.She is in a state of confusion that has her emotionally unstable. Similarly, when Barb calls Janice Grace, to which Janice responds No, its not. My name is Janice. I didnt know about Grace until six months ago. I dont feel comfortable being addressed that way. Its like somebody calling you Susan or Victoria all of the sudden. It doesnt feel right, (Taylor, 83). It can be said that Janice experiences an ambivalent atmosphither making her uncomfortable and exasperated with her surroundings, building a parapet wall between her and others.It is hard to imagine being called by one name all your life, and all of a sudden being told you have other name. It sets you back to the unknown giving you a sense of indignation, uncertainty and vexing. All in all, when an adopted person faces identity crisis, this individual will more than presumable experience some alienation, incredulity and frustration. The loss of culture and identity crisis are two major factors affecting Janices life furthermore, most of the indigenous children whom were adopted out during the Sixties Scoop will experience inner conflict dueto a lack of sense of belonging because they cannot find acceptance within themselves and the world around them.For example, Janice tells Barb Barb, think about it. I was born here, but I dont feel at home here and Amelia Earhart does. Shes family and Im not because the Childrens Aid Society took me away. Doesnt all this seem a little weird to you? ,(Taylor, 82-83). This part can be described as ironic because even though Janice recognizes her roots, she feels Otter Lake is not her place to be.She never had the opportunity to establish a connection, to create a bind between her background and herself. As a consequence she has a lack of affinity towards her biological family and her Aboriginal heritage. Moreover, when Janice confesses to Barb, I wanted to belong here so bad. When I drove up that driveway, it seemed like I had prepared my whole life for that meeting. But from the moment I arrived, I knew I didnt belong. You didnt even like me, (Taylor, 91).This expresses how Janice feels about her truth. The inevitable clash between her desire to belong to her past and the reality of her present, all of this leaving her in total perplexity. Therefore, it may be easier for a Native person to adapt to Western culture since they are surrounded by it, while to non-aboriginal people the Native culture is unknown. In other words, Janice feels the need to be accepted, to feel complete, but realizes that there is more to it than just looking like an Indian and wanting to be one.Having said that, it can be concluded that Janices life w as negatively impacted by the Sixties scoop creating obstacles to the development of a strong and healthy sense of concord and acknowledgement of her cultural background and heritage. In other words, she finds herself conflicting internally and doubting about her identity, the place she belongs to in the world and the knowledge as salubrious as the appreciation of her stolen life and culture as an Indian.

Donnie Darko

Donnie Darko Assessment Dashiell Lieberman I would like to answer this question not as the Dashiell we all know and love but as an existential Dashiell. As an existentialist I would want the truth and the facts that is a lot distinct than wanting an explanation. An existentialist doesnt believe that everything needs an explanation and a reason. They believe in the cold hard truth and facts like the great existential characters Donnie Darko and Mersault of The Stranger, who died for representing the last truth like Christ.So the truth I seek for my one day outside of reality is the creation of the world, the universe and who or what is the creator. Everything else in this world has been altered and corrupted by man and society but not the beginning that is true and untouched. I want to know the overall truth of the world, the great mystery that the whole world has wondered. The origin of everything is my biggest wonder as a man just looking for the truth with no explanations or in terpretations.I would travel through meter and space searching and observing the creation of everything that has come to be. I would love to talk to the creator, if so, and just ask him some casual questions or learn of our scientific origins and its amazement. If I had this one day I wouldnt waste it by doing insignificant things to make me happy for an hour I would go big of course, I cockeyed really big. I want these hours of freedom to change my life forever giving me the ultimate truth of the world so as an existentialist I can be satisfied knowing that there is no meaning or maybe there is.

Early Intervention in North Carolina

Early Intervention In conglutination Carolina Early intervention is a term that often is used to describe specific agencies, programs, services, and resources. In North Carolina, early Intervention has been described as a system of services provided by many different agencies and programs for children assume to five and their families. The system is for students who are having difficulties In the general education classroom but has not been placed Into the special education class. This comprehensive, interagency system is called TogetherWe Grow. Together We Grow has two parts 1) the infant-Toddler Program for children birth to three & 2) the Pre take Program for children ages three to five. The early intervention system of services is provided under federal official law, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Part C of the IDEA provides the federal mandate for services for young children. North Carolina Early Intervention Branch (NCEI) Is a part of the N. C. Div ision of Public Health and is the lead agency for the Infant Toddler Program (ITP).Research has found this to be the critical time to offer positive opportunities for child development. The state of North Carolina offers eighteen Childrens Developmental Services Agencies (CDAs) crossways the state and they work with local services to improve the children success. Together We Grow (ITP) serves families whose children have certain levels of developmental delay or conditions. They offer Service Coordination Physical, occupational and speech-language therapies Family support Special instruction Assistive technologyOther services Basic safeguards are providing to secure confidentiality of the passing of the child information. Together We Grow Preschool Program In February 2010, superintendent June Atkinson created NCDPIS Office of Early Learning to implement a strategic focus on the Pre-K Grade 3 learning continuum and its impact on high school graduation. NCDPls focus on Pre-K throug h Grade 3 alignment of standards, curriculum, Instructional practices and assessment maximizes learning gains for children throughout these early grades, providing a trong academic foundation that leads to alter high school graduation rates. There are many services that are offered within the Early Intervention program.

Do you agree with this interpretation of the importance of the battle of the Somme? Essay

Source A is an crush out from a report written by General Haig in December 1916 about a calendar month after the battle of the Somme, the report was past sent to the British cabinet. Douglas Haig was commander in chief of the British legions and in the report he was hard to show how vital he thinks the battle was in perspective of winning the war. As with every inception, it needs to be looked at in context so you can review its provenance and reli aptitude. When the report was writhen there was a new govern manpowert in Britain. David Lloyd George who had been Secretary of State for War was now primary Minister replacing.Haig had been criticised by Lloyd George, Churchill and Beaverbrook and for his strategy of attrition at the Somme, this being the cause of huge casualties during the battle and only a very small push in land taken. The British only gained an average of 5miles for 420,000 casualties. Haig was now starting his own battle back home to save his reputation as a soldiers commander.In the report Haig seems to have been using the report to justify his decisions that had led to the largest loss of pierces and manpower ever experienced by the British army in angiotensin converting enzyme battle.Haig was commander in chief during the Somme and it was his job to set the tactics for commanders to carry out. The fact that Haig was Commander in Chief at the Somme meant that he was largely answerable for the tactics used at the battle. This means that in source A Haig is having to defend or justify his actions in on the Somme. This will make the source less reliable as Haig has cause to be biased in his report. He is trying to keep his job and wants to be known as a great military hero not a military disaster. This would have given Haig even more motive to give a biased report.Haig was regard by the French generals and had the support of the king, this put him in a position of power particularly as there was no one better to do the job. He knew t hat members of the cabinet did not like him being Commander in Chief so this may have made Haig present the evidence in source A in a more positive light. He did this to protect his reputation, justify his decisions and to keep his job. in that respect is no evidence that Haig was a dishonorable man. However, the likelihood that he was badly informed about the situation and his self-confidence and the fact that he was wanting to protect his reputation and job mean that Haig could be biased in his report and his reliability as a source can be doubted.Looking at Source A, it looks like most of the extract is accurate precisely not completely accurate. Haig states, the German casualties have been greater than ours . This is misleading as although the British casualties were less than the German casualties (420,000-500,000), the combined assort casualties were more. The associate suffered 620,000 whereas the Germans suffered about half a million casualties. Nevertheless Haig may not have known about this at the time. Roll calls at the end of battles meant there were truthful records of allied casualties however German records would not have been available, so these casualty figures were estimates. Nonetheless Haig may have said the German casualties were greater than ours because he wants to keep his job and make his situation look better than it is.Haig admits that, the amount of ground we have gained is not great which is true but he then says, That is nothing. Even before the Somme, Haig had been more concerned with a strategy of attrition so. Haig was expecting his strategy to have large casualties but the public wanted a justification of why so many lives had been lost. Even though the German army had been disconnected from strong defensive positions the cost was very high and the Germans had ofttimes retreated to equally strong defensive positions. Haig was presenting only part of the situation. He is doing this to put himself in a positive light. Becaus e he wants to keep his job and be seen as a public hero rather than villain.However writing about the Somme in 1919 the German General Ludendorff wroteWe had heavy losses in men and material. As a result of the Somme we were completely exhausted on the western front.This German quote supports Haigs opinion of the effect of the Somme on the troops in the German army. Other than reports from captured prisoners its unclear how he can have been sure of this at the time. Whilst he has not lied in the report, Haig might be seen as guilty of laying out the information in a way that isnt completely truthful. Also he has been discriminatory by only mentioning the social welfare information. Perhaps the principal thing wrong with the extract is it not showing the impact of the Somme on the British troops, but this would have undermined his argument because this would have showed the overpower side of the war and therefore not put Haig in a positive light.In conclusion, it appears that in th e extract Haig is justifying his strategy of attrition at the Somme by showing the significance of the battle, for demonstrating the might of the British army, and its role in the destruction of the German army. Haig is reasonable in his view. It seems from the Reich archive that the affect on the German army from the Somme was great but nevertheless they still fought on for 2years. There are a number of key reasons why the Somme was important. It helped the French defence of Verdun and allied relations. It was a trial for new technologies in warfare such as tanks, machine guns and planes.Before the Somme, Kitcheners volunteer army had been amateurs and inexperienced. After the Somme, they were a force of battle hardened experienced troops. The objectives that were achieved through the Somme were done through a strategy that cost many lives and unfortunately many errors made the battle longer. There is no way of telling whether the same things could have been achieved using differen t tactics. Haig was writing his report to people who were hostile to him and his strategy. He believed in his strategy and his ability to win the war, he was also worried about defending his reputation and job.His original aim was to wear down the German army in a war of attrition. From his view he achieved his aim so it is understandable why he wrote what he did. It is my view that what he said he achieved was important but even as an report to the British government themselves it presents a biased view because Haig has all the motive to be biased.